Investment Positioning Questions: EDU #2635

September 2, 2026

Chris’s Summary
Jim and I are joined by Jacob as we tackle four listener questions on Investment Positioning ™, covering Quicken tools for tracking positions, funding a delay period Minimum Dignity Floor™ with a stable value fund, evaluating a too-good-to-be-true real estate return, and weighing a target date fund for long-term care reserves.

Jim’s “Pithy” Summary
Chris and I are joined by Jacob as we work through four listener emails, all circling back to how we think about Investment Positioning ™ in retirement.

(6:45) One listener wants to know what Quicken features another listener used to track positions. Jacob reads the original listener’s own description of using Quicken to set up investment positions, plus separate categories for essential and discretionary spending.

(14:30) George wonders whether the stable value fund in his large 401(k) is principal protected enough to draw on. He and his wife are both 60 and plan to delay Social Security roughly 10 years, and he’s weighing this fund as the source to bridge that gap. Jacob and I dig into rate reset timing, liquidity restrictions, and mandatory withholding before landing on an answer.

(46:45) A listener asks whether a real estate offer promising 18 to 30 percent annual returns is worth pursuing. Chris lays out the single clearest test I’ve heard for spotting too-good-to-be-true returns.

(1:09:30) Georgette raises the question of parking her long-term care dollars in a 2040 target date fund. Jacob walks through how we tier the L in our SEAL Reserve™ by age instead of relying on one fund’s glide path, and I get into the real difference between a “to” fund and a “through” fund, including the story of a deputy sheriff who learned that difference the hard way.

Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 1:30:21 — 41.4MB)

Subscribe: RSS